Spent the last four days at iSLC

So, this year instead of being an instructor for the Teacher Education Program (TEP) here in the College of Education at the University of Washington (UW), I’m an RA (research assistant) for a National Science Foundation (NSF) funded Science of Learning Center (SLC) called LIFE (Learning in Informal and Formal Environments). (How many acronyms can I put in there? πŸ™‚ )

There are six SLCs:

  1. Center of Excellence for Learning in Education, Science, and Technology (CELEST) – most brainy
  2. Learning in Informal and Formal Environments (LIFE) – most “everything is about life, dude”
  3. Pittsburg Science of Learning Center (PSLC) – most original name
  4. Spatial Intelligence and Learning Center (SILC) – most visual
  5. Temporal Dynamics of Learning Center (TDLC) – quickest, yet slowest
  6. Visual Language and Visual Learning (VL2) – most spatial

This past weekend the UW branch of LIFE (which also has branches at Stanford and SRI) hosted the second annual grad student and post-docs inter-center conference. It was pretty cool meeting all these other learning sciences students and hearing about their research. We were able to share tools and resources, findings, methods, theories and ideas, and some good drink and company at local bars after each day’s events.

There were a number of us interested in games for learning, from the use of virtual environments for studying the effects of 1st person vs. 3rd person POV on learning (Robb) to testing social vs. non-social feedback for navigation tasks (Dylan Arena), from task oriented vs. social oriented cultural learning goals (Amy) to collaborative activity-based multiplayer mouse control (Neema).

The first day, Sarah Walter from Stanford arrived early so we could meet and brainstorm proposals for upcoming conferences. She does almost the same research as me except that:

  • I am focusing on trying to map the way a raid group works to an ANT or distributed cognition model where she’s focusing more on specific collaboration practices.
  • My data only includes what players were already doing (chat logs, video, web forum threads), while Sarah’s got some interview and survey data in addition to what I’ve done.
  • I’m looking at a 40-person raid in World of Warcraft, while Sarah’s group is a 12-person raid in Lord of the Rings Online.

We quickly saw that it would be easy to start using the same coding scheme and collaborate on analyses so we could compare our settings and findings. We’re writing abstracts to submit to IR10 (Milwaukie, Oct) and DiGRA (London, Sept). Prob will also submit to GLS (Madison, June 10-12) but she’s going to be at CSCL in Greece (lucky!) at the same time as GLS.

On Friday, we had a full day of poster sessions and then workshops on inter and intra center collaboration. We need a match.com for researchers, one that pushes info to participants when something new of interest (maybe tag based) gets added rather than depending on us to go visit a site routinely. Does that exist?

Afterwards, dinner at Portage Bay Cafe was pretty good. Met Vanessa who researches media realism and its effects on arousal.

On Saturday, we had presentations and workshops on current research and tools. The workshop I went to was the video analysis one and ELAN (presented by Sarah Fish and Naomi Berlove of VL2) looks great!

On Sunday, the conference was technically over, but I spent the day working at a cafe with Sarah Lewis (also from Stanford), lunch with Turadg, Erin, Ruth, and Ido (all from CMU), and working at a different cafe with Turadg. Sarah and I talked a bit about our programs and profs and politics. Very informative. πŸ™‚

Turadg showed me some cool stuff he’s been working on that might help me with my chart creation… using python and pickling and a make file and such rather than going through all the crazy manual steps I’ve been doing with a text editor, excel, sql, flash, and photoshop. He’s also working on a collective web tool for learning that I’ve agreed to help with (though honestly, I only have a fuzzy image of what it is) and runs the Open Education Research blog.

Anyway, for anyone interested, below is the poster I presented (based off of the paper I was working on last month) at the conference. Also, you can get the bigger PDF version (13 MB).

Visualizing Chat Data in WoW
Visualizing Chat Data in a WoW Player Group

Twitter Tools and Lifestream

I deleted Twitter from Lifestream’s feed, so the daily digest should just include Google Reader (and Pandora if I can get it working). I also noticed that my blog was one of the feeds. Deleting that should kill the recursive pingbacks I’ve been getting.

Weekly digests via Twitter Tools is now off, too, but the sidebar is still up.

We’ll see how it goes. Facebook recently made their status updates more accessible or something, so that might change the way I update in the future.

As for reading my friends’s feeds, I’ll delay a solution a little until I get a new phone. πŸ™‚

Daily Digest for 2009-02-08

twitter (feed #4) 9:48pm Posted a tweet on Twitter.

mcdanger: home now. must get sleep.
blog (feed #1) 11:59pm Daily Digest for 2009-02-07
googlereader (feed #2) 7:42am Shared a link on Google Reader.

twitter (feed #4) 7:45am Posted a tweet on Twitter.

mcdanger: catching up on news. Gonna meet some LIFE folks from Stanford later today. Join us!
googlereader (feed #2) 7:51am Shared a link on Google Reader.

twitter (feed #4) 5:27pm Posted a tweet on Twitter.

mcdanger: meeting Theresa in WoW to plan a class lesson. πŸ™‚
googlereader (feed #2) 6:38pm Shared a link on Google Reader.

Daily Digest for 2009-02-07

blog (feed #1) 11:59pm Daily Digest for 2009-02-06
blog (feed #1) 11:59pm Twitter Weekly Updates for 2009-02-06
twitter (feed #4) 6:42am Posted a tweet on Twitter.

mcdanger: up too early…. getting ready for another full day at the iSLC conference.

Daily Digest for 2009-02-06

googlereader (feed #2) 1:15am Shared a link on Google Reader.

googlereader (feed #2) 1:55am Shared a link on Google Reader.

blog (feed #1) 4:59am Daily Digest for 2009-02-05

Twitter Weekly Updates for 2009-02-06

  • the superbowl has a twitter feed! #
  • reading this morning.. so much reading… super bowl party this afternoon! #

Powered by Twitter Tools.

Daily Digest for 2009-02-05

blog (feed #1) 11:59pm Daily Digest for 2009-02-04
googlereader (feed #2) 12:30am Shared a link on Google Reader.

googlereader (feed #2) 5:58am Shared a link on Google Reader.

googlereader (feed #2) 2:58pm Shared a link on Google Reader.

Daily Digest for 2009-02-04

blog (feed #1) 11:59pm Daily Digest for 2009-02-03
googlereader (feed #2) 12:04am Shared a link on Google Reader.

googlereader (feed #2) 8:27am Shared a link on Google Reader.

googlereader (feed #2) 9:32am Shared a link on Google Reader.

googlereader (feed #2) 1:58pm Shared a link on Google Reader.

googlereader (feed #2) 2:33pm Shared a link on Google Reader.

googlereader (feed #2) 2:46pm Shared a link on Google Reader.

blog (feed #1) 3:39pm Twitter Tools vs. Lifestream
twitter (feed #4) 3:41pm Posted a tweet on Twitter.

mcdanger: New blog post: Twitter Tools vs. Lifestream http://tinyurl.com/aq2osa

Twitter Tools vs. Lifestream

Okay, so it’s been a few days since I installed Twitter Tools and Lifestream.

The topmost sidebar widget on the right of the blog is from Twitter Tools. I like it, and it provides more info than Twitter’s official Flash-based widget.

The weekly digest (that was posted on Saturday) is also from Twitter Tools. I also like it and how it is formatted. I could not figure out how to set it to a different time than 1 AM, though. Whenever I set the time to a different one and hit Okay, the form would reset.

What I like about Lifestream is that it is somewhat like FriendFeed and captures updates from multiple feeds including Twitter and Google Reader. What I don’t like about Lifestream is that it didn’t seem to successfully capture my Pandora thumbs up and thumbs down picks. I also don’t like how the daily digest includes the previous day’s daily digest in its… er… digest. That seems rather redundant and cyclical, causing a little pingback comment to be generated each time, too.

So, verdict?

I’m not sure yet. I like the sidebar of Twitter Tools and I like Lifestream’s Google Reader capture. Maybe what I should do is keep both, but start disabling the things I don’t like about each.

Is anyone finding the daily digest excessive? What if I had a weekly Google Reader digests and just the Twitter feed on my sidebar?

And, while I’m asking, giving people better indication about me is just one side of what I want. I also want a better way of keeping track of people. Right now I’m following certain people on Twitter and Friendfeed, but neither are being pushed to me, so I’m not getting a good sense of when things are happening. Likewise with my Facebook friends… by the time I comment on a status update, it could be quite irrelevant, not to mention that most updates get lost in the ether before I can even see them to comment. Anyone have a good solution to this? Does having an unlimited data plan solve it or would I then be overwhelmed?

Daily Digest for 2009-02-03

blog (feed #1) 11:59pm Daily Digest for 2009-02-02
googlereader (feed #2) 4:00pm Shared a link on Google Reader.

googlereader (feed #2) 4:59pm Shared a link on Google Reader.

sporadic ramblings of a gamer in academia