All posts by markdangerchen

Mark Chen is an independent researcher of gaming culture and spare-time game designer. He is the author of Leet Noobs: The Life and Death of an Expert Player Group in World of Warcraft. Currently, he is looking into experimental and artistic games to promote exploration of moral dilemmas and human nature, researching DIY subcultures of Board Game Geek users, and generally investigating esoteric gaming practices. Mark also holds appointments at Pepperdine University, University of Washington, and University of Ontario Institute of Technology, teaching a variety of online and offline courses on game studies, game design, and games for learning. He earned a PhD in Learning Sciences/Educational Technology from the University of Washington and a BA in Studio Art from Reed College.

Awesome fan made Half-Life 2 movie series

Escape From City 17 – Part One

Holy moly.

Daily Digest for 2009-02-13

googlereader (feed #2) 7:05am Shared a link on Google Reader.

Twitter Weekly Updates for 2009-02-13

  • stupid google docs isn’t saving my work! #
  • explain your research in one tweet. #
  • wondering how the dean got added to my gtalk contacts… #
  • reflecting on LIFE, the conference, readings. I might have finally found my way into academia. 6 years in! How do others do it so quickly? #
  • updating blog. Then I’ll be reading for the rest of the day. #
  • meeting Theresa in WoW to plan a class lesson. πŸ™‚ #
  • catching up on news. Gonna meet some LIFE folks from Stanford later today. Join us! #
  • home now. must get sleep. #
  • up too early…. getting ready for another full day at the iSLC conference. #

Powered by Twitter Tools.

Looks like Julian just started a blog!

Julian Dibbell

Well, last month…

He writes about gold farming and such for Wired and such. πŸ™‚

Change to Leet Noobs page

Just added this to the Leet Noobs page to reflect my change in emphasis:

[Edit Feb 13, 2009:

I’ve moved slightly away from thinking about WoW as a two phase (two stage) process. I mean, it is helpful and maybe ethnographically correct–as in some players see it that way–but the line between the stages is very blurred, especially for anyone leveling up a character after their first one.

I wrote a paper that started out as me describing these two stages more. I intended to include things such as chat data and video analysis to illustrate the stages better, but I didn’t have time to do that kind of analysis for the deadline, so instead I turned it into a “how did ethnography help me” kind of paper, which seemed to make sense since it was for a special issue of Transformative Works and Cultures on ethnography and games.

Well, the reviewers, editor, and I eventually agreed that I should reframe what I submitted into a description of the social dimensions of expertise found in both stage one and stage two of character development. It’s a much better paper now after the review process than it started out as, but I’m afraid it reads a little hacked together (because it *was* a little hacked together!). Yet, I’m happy to say that it will, in fact, be appearing in TWC this Spring! πŸ™‚

As for “Leet Noobs,” I am considering using it as the title for my dissertation, which, at this point, looks like it will be recasting the various publications I have through the lens of Actor-Network Theory/Distributed Cognition (maybe some Activity Theory thrown in, to boot) and be done by December 2009.

]

Also, NSF was here last Friday and Saturday for a visit to the LIFE Center while “us kids” were doing our grad student inter-SLC conference. One of the NSF folks really digged my poster and requested it be sent to him. We ended up sending him the charts one instead since it has more data on it. πŸ™‚

Recent publications

I’ve been remiss in posting when things of mine get published.

I just now updated the Papers page with this:

  • Chen, M. (forthcoming). Visualization of expert chat development in a World of Warcraft player group. E-Learning.
  • Chen, M. (forthcoming). Social dimensions of expertise in World of Warcraft players.Transformative Works and Cultures.
  • Chen, M. (2009). Communication, coordination, and camaraderie in World of Warcraft. Games and Culture 4, 47-73.Β  Check out the different versions of this paper I’ve made available in the name of making academia transparent!Β  Email me for the final version or wait til it gets published in 2009.
  • Chen, M. (2008). The player matters: A review of Ninja Gaiden: Dragon Sword. E-Learning 5(4), 508-512.
  • Chen, M. (2008). Moral ambiguity in The Witcher: A game review. E-Learning 5(3), 358-365.

Daily Digest for 2009-02-11

googlereader (feed #2) 9:00pm Shared a link on Google Reader.

googlereader (feed #2) 1:06am Shared a link on Google Reader.

googlereader (feed #2) 10:20am Shared a link on Google Reader.

Daily Digest for 2009-02-10

googlereader (feed #2) 9:36pm Shared a link on Google Reader.

googlereader (feed #2) 10:50pm Shared a link on Google Reader.

googlereader (feed #2) 1:24am Shared a link on Google Reader.

googlereader (feed #2) 5:30am Shared a link on Google Reader.

googlereader (feed #2) 6:00am Shared a link on Google Reader.

googlereader (feed #2) 7:48am Shared a link on Google Reader.

googlereader (feed #2) 8:00am Shared a link on Google Reader.

googlereader (feed #2) 1:30pm Shared a link on Google Reader.

googlereader (feed #2) 3:20pm Shared a link on Google Reader.

googlereader (feed #2) 3:30pm Shared a link on Google Reader.

googlereader (feed #2) 4:24pm Shared a link on Google Reader.

googlereader (feed #2) 4:34pm Shared a link on Google Reader.

googlereader (feed #2) 5:19pm Shared a link on Google Reader.

Daily Digest for 2009-02-09

googlereader (feed #2) 11:15am Shared a link on Google Reader.

googlereader (feed #2) 4:36pm Shared a link on Google Reader.

googlereader (feed #2) 5:50pm Shared a link on Google Reader.

Spent the last four days at iSLC

So, this year instead of being an instructor for the Teacher Education Program (TEP) here in the College of Education at the University of Washington (UW), I’m an RA (research assistant) for a National Science Foundation (NSF) funded Science of Learning Center (SLC) called LIFE (Learning in Informal and Formal Environments). (How many acronyms can I put in there? πŸ™‚ )

There are six SLCs:

  1. Center of Excellence for Learning in Education, Science, and Technology (CELEST) – most brainy
  2. Learning in Informal and Formal Environments (LIFE) – most “everything is about life, dude”
  3. Pittsburg Science of Learning Center (PSLC) – most original name
  4. Spatial Intelligence and Learning Center (SILC) – most visual
  5. Temporal Dynamics of Learning Center (TDLC) – quickest, yet slowest
  6. Visual Language and Visual Learning (VL2) – most spatial

This past weekend the UW branch of LIFE (which also has branches at Stanford and SRI) hosted the second annual grad student and post-docs inter-center conference. It was pretty cool meeting all these other learning sciences students and hearing about their research. We were able to share tools and resources, findings, methods, theories and ideas, and some good drink and company at local bars after each day’s events.

There were a number of us interested in games for learning, from the use of virtual environments for studying the effects of 1st person vs. 3rd person POV on learning (Robb) to testing social vs. non-social feedback for navigation tasks (Dylan Arena), from task oriented vs. social oriented cultural learning goals (Amy) to collaborative activity-based multiplayer mouse control (Neema).

The first day, Sarah Walter from Stanford arrived early so we could meet and brainstorm proposals for upcoming conferences. She does almost the same research as me except that:

  • I am focusing on trying to map the way a raid group works to an ANT or distributed cognition model where she’s focusing more on specific collaboration practices.
  • My data only includes what players were already doing (chat logs, video, web forum threads), while Sarah’s got some interview and survey data in addition to what I’ve done.
  • I’m looking at a 40-person raid in World of Warcraft, while Sarah’s group is a 12-person raid in Lord of the Rings Online.

We quickly saw that it would be easy to start using the same coding scheme and collaborate on analyses so we could compare our settings and findings. We’re writing abstracts to submit to IR10 (Milwaukie, Oct) and DiGRA (London, Sept). Prob will also submit to GLS (Madison, June 10-12) but she’s going to be at CSCL in Greece (lucky!) at the same time as GLS.

On Friday, we had a full day of poster sessions and then workshops on inter and intra center collaboration. We need a match.com for researchers, one that pushes info to participants when something new of interest (maybe tag based) gets added rather than depending on us to go visit a site routinely. Does that exist?

Afterwards, dinner at Portage Bay Cafe was pretty good. Met Vanessa who researches media realism and its effects on arousal.

On Saturday, we had presentations and workshops on current research and tools. The workshop I went to was the video analysis one and ELAN (presented by Sarah Fish and Naomi Berlove of VL2) looks great!

On Sunday, the conference was technically over, but I spent the day working at a cafe with Sarah Lewis (also from Stanford), lunch with Turadg, Erin, Ruth, and Ido (all from CMU), and working at a different cafe with Turadg. Sarah and I talked a bit about our programs and profs and politics. Very informative. πŸ™‚

Turadg showed me some cool stuff he’s been working on that might help me with my chart creation… using python and pickling and a make file and such rather than going through all the crazy manual steps I’ve been doing with a text editor, excel, sql, flash, and photoshop. He’s also working on a collective web tool for learning that I’ve agreed to help with (though honestly, I only have a fuzzy image of what it is) and runs the Open Education Research blog.

Anyway, for anyone interested, below is the poster I presented (based off of the paper I was working on last month) at the conference. Also, you can get the bigger PDF version (13 MB).

Visualizing Chat Data in WoW
Visualizing Chat Data in a WoW Player Group