All posts by cmgp

Nice!

Usually I scour my junk mail for good porn, but Mark, those links should keep me busy for a good 10-15 minutes… Anyway, I thought your comments about science-literacy and perception of scientists in movies were really interesting. Recently, there was this article in MIT’s Technology Review magazine about an alumnus who has been doing scientific consulting on big-budget Hollywood movies.

“When the film’s editor wanted to know how fast the Hulk had to be running in order to jump a mile, for example, he called in Underkoffler to apply some calculus.”

Interesting, huh? Yes, the Hulk is moving fast enough to jump a mile, but does that explain the genetic and physical changes that take place in Bruce Banner that allow him to make that jump? Clearly not, but Ph.D. scientists like Underkoffler are employing the proper language and “science” to make those changes sound plausible… In the end, the movie-watcher may have a difficult time knowing where the reality ends and the fantasy begins…

PS. Bonus porn: who likes hair?

Beware the links in this post

Lots of really famous and “upstanding” people have had articles published in men’s magazines… John Updike in that same issue, for example. I know that some sci-fi/fantasy writers and cartoonists see Playboy as one of the best venues in terms of money paid and status. Now, if the article showed up in Barely Legal or something… Besides, there’s nothing wrong with good porn; it’s the bad porn we should scorn.

To get back to the scientifically illiterate. I maintain that most of America is illiterate when it comes down to “thinking like a scientist” in terms of being able to demonstrate the scientific method in a specific sense (since the method of studying in a controlled environment is not the only way to do research) and in terms of thinking about the world around them with an eye towards why and how things are the way they are in a more general sense. What I was getting at was that the audience may know it’s usually totally bogus what is represented in Hollywood, but their understanding of movies as not science prejudices them to what science can be. Their literacy in movies is spilling over into their literacy about science, which is to say, the way science and scientists are portrayed completely obliterates any sense of what science and scientists are.

Parents should provide a good example.

http://wonderclub.com/magazines/playboy/playboy_magazine_1975.htm

Don’t worry, it’s not what you think. Scroll down to August, under “features”, the 4th one down. Yep, that’s who you think it is. Let’s see now, I was born in March of 1976, so you do the math.

squad based tactical games demos

Hey all…

The UFO:Aftermath demo is out today and worth checking out. This is sort of the unofficial sequal to X-COM. I haven’t played it much yet, but some things strike me immediately:

1. the attributes and character development is more detailed than the original X-COM which is great.

2. the combat is pausable real-time instead of turn-based which is okay, I guess, but you don’t get the same sense of urgency and motivation to maximize your efficiency… you spend less time thinking about what you should do and instead just sort of move your guys around… power in numbers here instead of strategy.

3. NO enterable buildings meaning no destructable walls and floors! and no varying levels of elevation! WTF??

This coupled with the fact that no significant gains in user interface have been implemented despite this being 9 years after the original came out might make this game dead in the water.

That is just too bad, but to semi-make up for it is the Silent Storm demo. This is another squad based tactical combat game this time set in WW2. The missions are pre-made instead of random like in X-COM or UFO: Aftermath so it might not have that much replayability, but I could see the UFO: Aftermath missions getting stale really fast. A bonus is that Silent Storm is supposed to come out with a level editor so the fan-made list of missions might make up for the non-randomness. This game is truely turn-based except during non-combat periods and it also features a skill system similar to Diablo 2. Actually, if UFO: Aftermath is an unofficial sequal to X-COM then Silent Storm is the unofficial sequal to Jagged Alliance 2, except that it carries the legacy on quite well. It’s always fun shooting nazis, after all.

UFO:A comes out later this month while Silent Storm comes out Q1 2004. At this point, I’d wait for UFO:A to hit the bargain bin but getting Silent Storm as it is released would be a safe bet.

Seconded

Hahahah Mark, I’m with you on that one. Did anyone see Maddox’s take on the Honda Element? Maybe you should add the “Aztek” to the most-wanted list, Melhus?

Another fun bit of news: our esteemed National Security Advisor thinks that the David Kay report, if released last spring, would have led the whole world to support the invasion of Iraq. Check our her comments here. An interesting commentary, on the whole. As another masterstroke, she mentions that the Kay report runs 6000 words. It MUST be bad if it’s a whole 6000 words! I mean, government documents are usually no more than 58 words! Saddam MUSTA been up to something if they have to take a whole 12 pages to summarize the combined results of 1500 people looking for several months…

damn Chris

you sure do like fugly cars

so the choice is between a piece of luggage and an 80s Transformer?

Squash?

I’d love to get a new car, but first I need to get a real job. Here’s my wish list:

1) Scion xB (Toyota). This car is fresh, plus it starts at $14K– which isn’t too nasty.

2) Element (Honda). Start’s around $16K. Katie’s parents just got one of these (in the color pictured, Sunset Orange). I got a ride in one a week ago, and the interior is huge. That is a precious commodity for a tall dude. As much as I like driving Katie’s Civic, I get a little tired of having my dome rub against the ceiling all the time… I do have one complaing with this car, though. Why put the sun roof in the back over the trunk? The best part of a sun roof is looking up, seeing the sky, and sticking your head/hand up there…

OK, here it is: Schrag, pass the salt. I need to eat my words about the Sox. So maybe they aren’t really losers, and maybe- just maybe, they’ll continue to put it on the Yankees like they did last night. You watching this weekend? Maybe I’ll come down…

PS. What’s the sales tax down there in RI? I gotta do a little shopping this weekend…

Ben’s thoughts on “Moneyball” by Michael Lewis

I just finished a book called “Moneyball” called Michael Lewis. It’s a book about baseball. It is, in particular, about a small group of people who have begun thinking about the game in a revolutionary new way. These people have been around since the 1970’s, but were not the people who made the decisions … until a few years ago, when a former ballplayer named Billy Beane became the general manager of the Oakland A’s.

Baseball is a game of tradition and has been long dominated by certain ideas about how to win, and about what is valuable in a player. These ideas have been around for so long and are so widely accepted that they have been completely unchallenged for decades. For example, almost every major league scout has an idea about what type of frame constitutes a “major league body” and about what skills are important in defining major league talent. In the mid-1970’s a tiny group of students of the game began using the emerging technology of personal computing to analyze the minutiae of the game: batting averages, on-base percentages, fielding statistics, and all the endless data which is generated by each passing season.

What these people came to realize was that many of the most treasured ideas of the baseball establishment were wrong. Among other things, this small group of enthusiasts realized that the most important thing in a hitter was not defense or baserunning, or even batting average, but the ability to NOT make an out. Because the length of each inning is defined by the timing of the third out, it is paramount that a hitter puts the ball in play or walks as often as possible. All other skills, which are still thought by most baseball insiders to be of roughly equal importance, are far less important than this trait. Armed with this insight, and several related ones, the A’s have gone about scouting talent and assembling a team in a whole new way.

I won’t go more into the nuts and bolts of the statistics involved. I think this part of the book was particularily interesting to me because I’ve often had fragmentary thoughts along the lines of those discussed in this book: if a walk is as good as a hit, why is batting average the most valued statistic? It’s always thrilling for someone who’s interested in numbers to see that the results of some basic statistical analyses can have such a momentous effect on some aspect of everyday life. Lewis does a good job outlining the new ways of thinking without getting bogged down in mathematics. He instead chooses to focus on the consequences of the first implementation of this way of thinking in the Oakland A’s organization. Most obviously, this new way of evaluating talent has led to a phenomenal string of successful seasons for the A’s, who have consistently had one of the lowest payrolls in the major leagues for a decade. Even as richer teams buy the best A’s players, the management of the A’s manages to re-build a team which challenges teams with triple their financial resources.

The thought that good ideas and careful analysis can overwhelm the sheer force of money is a tantalizing one, and it appeals to me for many reasons. It’s a classic David-vs.-Goliath story which has created some of the most riveting drama, both on and off the field, in baseball for the last few years. It also leads to a number of sometimes touching, sometimes hilarious sub-plots in the book. One of these is the fact that the rest of the baseball establishment is beginning to take notice of the new baseball wisdom, making it paramount for Beane and the A’s to use all variety of deception, coercion, and misdirection to stay a step ahead of other organizations who would attempt to copy their way of doing things. Other memorable portions of the book center on the reactions of players when first being asked by the A’s to do things (switch defensive positions) they would never have anticipated with other teams.

Ultimately, the most powerful parts of this story are those which center on the players, regarded as second-tier talent by baseball purists due to some perceived flaw, who have finally had their true value recognized by Beane and the A’s. These players would have had little chance to make a significant impact in baseball just five years ago, because their skills and make-up did not fit baseball’s traditional profiles. One by one, the rise of these players to success in the major leagues are detailed, and these stories are used to illustrate the central ideas of Beane and his number-crunchers. There’s Scott Hatteberg, a journeyman catcher who does not excel in any of baseball’s five traditional tools (hit, hit with power, run, field, and throw), but has an uncanny ability to pick his pitch and control the strike zone. There’s Chad Bradford, a pitcher whose low velocity and unusual delivery had relegated him to minor league ball with another team before the A’s acquired him and turned him into one of the premier relievers in the game.

And, most memorably, there is the tale of Jeremy Brown. Brown is a catcher who graduated college a year ago, and who no other pro team even bothered to scout because of his large frame (5′-8″ and 215 pounds). Upon seeing a trend in Brown’s numbers which indicated that he was an extraordinarily tough out, the A’s draft him in the first round, several hundred players above the expectations of anyone, including Brown himself. True to the A’s expectations, and despite the continual name-calling and taunting of his teammates and the media, Brown begins tearing up the minor leagues almost immediately, eventually proving himself to his teammates and to the writers, who put him among the top three hitters in the entire 2002 draft. The final paragraphs of the book are testament to Lewis’ genius, as he ties the main themes of the book together in as moving a passage as I’ve read this year:

“The fourth pitch is the mistake: the pitcher goes back to his change-up. Jeremy sees his arm coming through slowly again, and this time he knows to wait on it. The change-up arrives waist-high over the middle of the plate. The line drive Jeremy hits screams over the pitcher’s right ear and into the gap in left center field.

As he leaves the batter’s box, Jeremy sees the left and center fielders converging fast. The left fielder, thinking he might make the catch, is running himself out of position to play the ball off the wall. Jeremy knows he hit it hard, and so he knows what’s going to happen next — or imagines he does. The ball is going to hit the wall and ricochet back into the field. The left fielder, having overrun it, will have to turn around and chase after it. Halfway down the first-base line, Jeremy Brown has one thought in his mind: I’m gonna get a triple.

It’s a new thought for him. He isn’t built for triples. He hasn’t hit a triple in years. He thrills to the idea: Jeremy Brown, hitter of triples. A funny thing has happened since he became, by some miracle, the most upwardly mobile hitter in the Oakland A’s minor league system. Surrounded by people who keep telling him he’s capable of almost anything, he’s coming to believe it himself.

He races around first (“I’m haulin’ ass now”) and picks up the left fielder, running with his back to him, but not the ball. He’s running as hard as he’s ever run — and then he’s not. Between first and second base his feet go out from under him and he backflops into the dirt, like Charlie Brown. He notices, first, a shooting pain in his hand: he’s jammed his finger. He picks himself up, to scramble back to the safety of first base, when he sees his teammates in the dugout. The guys are falling all over each other, laughing. Swish. Stanley. Teahen. Kiger. Everybody’s laughing at him again. But their laughter has a different tone; it’s not the sniggering laughter of the people who made fun of his body. It’s something else. He looks out into the gap in left center field. The outfielders are just standing there: they’ve stopped chasing the ball. The ball’s gone. The triple of Jeremy Brown’s imagination, in reality, is a home run.”

It’s great stuff, even for people who don’t follow baseball. In fact, especially for people who don’t follow it. Pick it up if you get a chance.

What’s in your wallet?

1. HEAVY ROTATION (more than a few days)

  • sonna “smile and the world smiles with you”
  • him “many in high places”
  • “The Neptunes present Clones”
  • Prefuse 73 “Extinguished: Outtakes”

ages.amazon.com/images/P/B00006WKUF.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg” width=170>

2. Light Rotation (A day or two)

  • Karate “UnsolveD”
  • Kool Keith “The Lost Masters”
  • Vermont “Living Together”
  • Tracker “Polk”
  • Brad “Interiors”
  • The Sea and Cake “Oui”
  • Rufus Wainwright “Poses”

/images/P/B00004WIPE.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg” width=170>

3. Recent Heavy Rotation

  • Grandaddy “Sumday”
  • Radiohead “Hail to the Theif”

“http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B00009EIQB.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg” width=170>

Life

Hi guys,

Had a good trip up to Seattle! Mark and Robin live in a real nice area…Hawthorne/NW PDX type. Real convenient with that bike store so close by..haha! Here are a couple of pics that I thought were kinda amusing. So who’s the ‘Tannery Brook Kid’..i’m confused. I’ve been downloading songs from radiohead’s hail to the theif album. mind you i’m a fan but just haven’t had a chance to pick up the cd.

if you guys haven’t seen ‘bowling for columbine’ you should check it out. i thought it was pretty powerful and funny at the same time. i can’t really remember the last time i had a serious discussion about a movie after seeing it.


anyway, i’ll be taking my GREs on the 20th…after that it’s UC Davis or bust..i guess it won’t be the end of the world if i don’t get in. Ben, you think you can call up some buddies back home and pull some strings?…haha..

Okay, i just had to include this pick of mark and i next to the fellowship. i think between the both of us we could take them all out but i guess gandalf might be a handful. mark and i could body slam those hobbits though.