Well, last month…
He writes about gold farming and such for Wired and such. 🙂

Just added this to the Leet Noobs page to reflect my change in emphasis:
[Edit Feb 13, 2009:
I’ve moved slightly away from thinking about WoW as a two phase (two stage) process. I mean, it is helpful and maybe ethnographically correct–as in some players see it that way–but the line between the stages is very blurred, especially for anyone leveling up a character after their first one.
I wrote a paper that started out as me describing these two stages more. I intended to include things such as chat data and video analysis to illustrate the stages better, but I didn’t have time to do that kind of analysis for the deadline, so instead I turned it into a “how did ethnography help me” kind of paper, which seemed to make sense since it was for a special issue of Transformative Works and Cultures on ethnography and games.
Well, the reviewers, editor, and I eventually agreed that I should reframe what I submitted into a description of the social dimensions of expertise found in both stage one and stage two of character development. It’s a much better paper now after the review process than it started out as, but I’m afraid it reads a little hacked together (because it *was* a little hacked together!). Yet, I’m happy to say that it will, in fact, be appearing in TWC this Spring! 🙂
As for “Leet Noobs,” I am considering using it as the title for my dissertation, which, at this point, looks like it will be recasting the various publications I have through the lens of Actor-Network Theory/Distributed Cognition (maybe some Activity Theory thrown in, to boot) and be done by December 2009.
]
Also, NSF was here last Friday and Saturday for a visit to the LIFE Center while “us kids” were doing our grad student inter-SLC conference. One of the NSF folks really digged my poster and requested it be sent to him. We ended up sending him the charts one instead since it has more data on it. 🙂
I’ve been remiss in posting when things of mine get published.
I just now updated the Papers page with this:
|
9:00pm | Shared a link on Google Reader. |
|
1:06am | Shared a link on Google Reader. |
|
10:20am | Shared a link on Google Reader. |
|
9:36pm | Shared a link on Google Reader. |
|
10:50pm | Shared a link on Google Reader. |
|
1:24am | Shared a link on Google Reader. |
|
5:30am | Shared a link on Google Reader. |
|
6:00am | Shared a link on Google Reader. |
|
7:48am | Shared a link on Google Reader. |
|
8:00am | Shared a link on Google Reader. |
|
1:30pm | Shared a link on Google Reader. |
|
3:20pm | Shared a link on Google Reader. |
|
3:30pm | Shared a link on Google Reader. |
|
4:24pm | Shared a link on Google Reader. |
|
4:34pm | Shared a link on Google Reader. |
|
5:19pm | Shared a link on Google Reader. |
|
11:15am | Shared a link on Google Reader. |
|
4:36pm | Shared a link on Google Reader. |
|
5:50pm | Shared a link on Google Reader. |
So, this year instead of being an instructor for the Teacher Education Program (TEP) here in the College of Education at the University of Washington (UW), I’m an RA (research assistant) for a National Science Foundation (NSF) funded Science of Learning Center (SLC) called LIFE (Learning in Informal and Formal Environments). (How many acronyms can I put in there? 🙂 )
There are six SLCs:
This past weekend the UW branch of LIFE (which also has branches at Stanford and SRI) hosted the second annual grad student and post-docs inter-center conference. It was pretty cool meeting all these other learning sciences students and hearing about their research. We were able to share tools and resources, findings, methods, theories and ideas, and some good drink and company at local bars after each day’s events.
There were a number of us interested in games for learning, from the use of virtual environments for studying the effects of 1st person vs. 3rd person POV on learning (Robb) to testing social vs. non-social feedback for navigation tasks (Dylan Arena), from task oriented vs. social oriented cultural learning goals (Amy) to collaborative activity-based multiplayer mouse control (Neema).
The first day, Sarah Walter from Stanford arrived early so we could meet and brainstorm proposals for upcoming conferences. She does almost the same research as me except that:
We quickly saw that it would be easy to start using the same coding scheme and collaborate on analyses so we could compare our settings and findings. We’re writing abstracts to submit to IR10 (Milwaukie, Oct) and DiGRA (London, Sept). Prob will also submit to GLS (Madison, June 10-12) but she’s going to be at CSCL in Greece (lucky!) at the same time as GLS.
On Friday, we had a full day of poster sessions and then workshops on inter and intra center collaboration. We need a match.com for researchers, one that pushes info to participants when something new of interest (maybe tag based) gets added rather than depending on us to go visit a site routinely. Does that exist?
Afterwards, dinner at Portage Bay Cafe was pretty good. Met Vanessa who researches media realism and its effects on arousal.
On Saturday, we had presentations and workshops on current research and tools. The workshop I went to was the video analysis one and ELAN (presented by Sarah Fish and Naomi Berlove of VL2) looks great!
On Sunday, the conference was technically over, but I spent the day working at a cafe with Sarah Lewis (also from Stanford), lunch with Turadg, Erin, Ruth, and Ido (all from CMU), and working at a different cafe with Turadg. Sarah and I talked a bit about our programs and profs and politics. Very informative. 🙂
Turadg showed me some cool stuff he’s been working on that might help me with my chart creation… using python and pickling and a make file and such rather than going through all the crazy manual steps I’ve been doing with a text editor, excel, sql, flash, and photoshop. He’s also working on a collective web tool for learning that I’ve agreed to help with (though honestly, I only have a fuzzy image of what it is) and runs the Open Education Research blog.
Anyway, for anyone interested, below is the poster I presented (based off of the paper I was working on last month) at the conference. Also, you can get the bigger PDF version (13 MB).

I deleted Twitter from Lifestream’s feed, so the daily digest should just include Google Reader (and Pandora if I can get it working). I also noticed that my blog was one of the feeds. Deleting that should kill the recursive pingbacks I’ve been getting.
Weekly digests via Twitter Tools is now off, too, but the sidebar is still up.
We’ll see how it goes. Facebook recently made their status updates more accessible or something, so that might change the way I update in the future.
As for reading my friends’s feeds, I’ll delay a solution a little until I get a new phone. 🙂
|
9:48pm |
Posted a tweet on Twitter.
mcdanger: home now. must get sleep.
|
|
11:59pm | Daily Digest for 2009-02-07 |
|
7:42am | Shared a link on Google Reader. |
|
7:45am |
Posted a tweet on Twitter.
mcdanger: catching up on news. Gonna meet some LIFE folks from Stanford later today. Join us!
|
|
7:51am | Shared a link on Google Reader. |
|
5:27pm |
Posted a tweet on Twitter.
mcdanger: meeting Theresa in WoW to plan a class lesson. 🙂
|
|
6:38pm | Shared a link on Google Reader. |
|
11:59pm | Daily Digest for 2009-02-06 |
|
11:59pm | Twitter Weekly Updates for 2009-02-06 |
|
6:42am |
Posted a tweet on Twitter.
mcdanger: up too early…. getting ready for another full day at the iSLC conference.
|